|
Read about Pairat Songpanich by
|
 |
|
in the Tropics
Page 2
Edited and Translated by Dr. Slearmlarp Wasuwat, Thailand
 |
< Nymphaea 'Gloriosa' Graphic illustration in Figure 2 demonstrates an outstanding performance in flowering by Nymphaea 'Gloriosa' at 163 blooms per year. Next were N. 'Charles de Meurville', N. 'Sirius' and N. 'Peachglow' produced 127, 116 and 114 blooms respectively. The lowest were N. 'Perry's Fire Opal', N. 'Sanguinea', N. 'Sunrise', N. 'Gonnère', N. 'Yuh Ling', and N. 'Colorado' which bloomed 28, 28, 30, 33 and 36 respectively. It should be noted here that N. 'Gloriosa' produced flowers nine times more than N. 'Perry's Fire Opal'. Average number of flowers produced by 21 cultivars was 73 blooms/cultivar/year. Nine cultivars produced blooms at higher than average value; the other 12 cultivars were lower. < N. 'Perry's Fire Opal' |
|
 |
||
 Figure 2. One year flowering performance of hardy waterlily in the tropics |
|
Graphic illustration in Figure 3 shows that the pattern of flower production of all cultivars varied in similar directions. Each year and on the average, flower production was only a little early in the year and gradually increased until April. They increased slightly during April and May, then increased to their peak in July. The flowering then gradually dropped to their lowest at the end of the year.  Figure 3. Flower production in 2001-2003 and their averages |
| Graphics presented in Figure 4 indicate a positive correlation of flowering production and day length (number of hours between sunrise and sunset). Even though the latitude at the studied location area was 13° 51' 40" North, the longest day in June was 12.80 hours and the shortest day length in December was 11.20 hours. The difference was only 1.60 hours. Note the highest flower production of 266 in July compared to the lowest of 18 flowers in January. Both results were about one month after the highest and lowest of day length peak. It can be confirmed that day length is one of the major factors influencing flowering production of hardy waterlilies when grown in the tropics. | ||
 Figure 4. Correlation of day length and flower production of hardy waterlilies in the tropics |
||
|
Looking back at Table 1, one may notice some cultivars were very sensitive, some partially sensitive to short day length.
Temperature was the second factor affecting flowering of hardy waterlilies, next to day length. Extreme hot or cold climate would reduce flower production. |
| The monthly temperature averages over three years during the studies and average of monthly flowering in Figure 5 shows the influence of temperature. Rate of flower production was reduced for one to two months from May to June after very hot temperatures in April. Also, flowers were few, even more so, during very cold [for Thailand] weather in December and January. Some cultivars rested and dropped their floating leaves. Thus, one can conclude that day length and temperature are two factors influencing flower production of hardy waterlilies grown in the tropics. | ||
 Figure 5. Influence of temperature on flowering of hardy waterlilies grown in the tropics |
||
| There were no outstanding effects of daily duration of sunlight (Figure 6), and relative humidity (Figure 7). | ||
 Figure 6. Relation of sunlight and flowering of hardy waterlilies in the tropics |
||
 Figure 7. Relation of relative humidity and flowering of hardy waterlilies in the tropics |
|
Conclusion Besides good care and maintenance of hardy waterlilies in a tropical climate, for best production of flowers, day length and temperature are two major factors. Long day length increases flowering and vise-versa. Cold climate that affects growth of most plants makes a more pronounced effect on hardy waterlilies when grown in tropical areas. |
< Page 1
|
Home | Join WGI | Members' Exclusive | Gateway to Water Gardening |